-
The
final element of these memorials to which we must turn seems
at first to be more intimate but is actually just as distancing
as static: the voice.
Up to this point we have focused on elements of Deleuze and
Guattaris philosophy of music that have no clear correlatives
in popular music criticism, but with the voice we move onto
critical terrain that is currently dominated by methods and
categories drawn from psychoanalysis, an interpretive strategy
on which Deleuze and Guattari declared
war in Anti-Oedipus. Our purpose here is not to rehearse
that all-out assault, nor to intervene concretely in the ongoing
musicological debates over the voice, but merely to identify
the general limits of a psychoanalytic representational approach
to pop music as a way of highlighting the originality of Deleuze
and Guattaris productivist perspective.
-
In psychoanalysis and the criticism derived
from it, the voice functions like the gaze to address and
thus subjectify individuals, to interpellate them as the subjects
of a symbolic order whose structure their psyches
reflect imperfectly.25
Thus the recorded voice forms an "acoustic mirror"
in which the subject (mis)recognizes him/herself, and the
activity of listening to that voice becomes an unavoidably
narcissistic enterprise.26
Deleuze and Guattari accept the validity of this model as
far as it goes, but they propose a more broadly based alternative
that also opens up new territories and structures for music.27
The
narcissistic model of listening, they claim, is a fundamentally
retrospective and representational one that cannot account
for the production of novelty or innovation in music. Everything
new gets cut down to fit the Procrustean bed of universal
Oedipal triangulation ("papa-mama-me") and the endless
deferral of desire conceived as lack; every
action is separated from its practical efficacy to become
a pure dramatic signifier of the interminable desire for desire.
The psychoanalytic unconscious is a Victorian theater of familial
narcissism, a model of dialectical negativity that is incapable
of escaping its own constitutive impasses, so Deleuze and
Guattari propose instead a productivist unconscious that exceeds
the representational model on all sides.28
This affirmative model enables the prospective temporality
of subjective improvisation as well as the negative abyss
of psychoanalysis repetition compulsion.
- The voice
provides a good example of the interpretive consequences that
this broader model entails. In much pop music, the voice is
the fixed point of thematic reterritorialization around which
the sounds temporarily deterritorialize (through distortion,
feedback, overdubbing, etc.). "[A]s long as the voice is
song, its main role is to 'hold' sound, it functions as a constant
circumscribed on a note and accompanied by the instrument"
(A Thousand Plateaus 96). Since the listeners attention
to the voice as a carrier of discursive content or meaning usually
effaces its impact as sound or intensity, the voice most often
functions to delimit and preserve the pre-established territories
of the piece, both harmonically and conceptually. The voice
tells us what the song is about, and it does this while doubling
or harmonizing with its accompanying instrumental melody, and
reproducing the more or less regular meter. The voice, especially
the "good" or "trained" voice in pop music,
addresses the listener, demands (mis)recognition and interpellates
her/him as a docile subject precisely because of the power it
gains by this process of harmonic/thematic reduplication or
reterritorialization. This can be true even (and especially)
when the voice sings or speaks of escape, of lines of flight
out of its territorial constraints; think for example of the
vicious irony of "I'm Free" from the Who's Tommy
("I'm free/Im free/And I'm waiting for you to follow
me
"), which reterritorializes the newly-claimed
freedom of the "I" in its control of the second person,
the "you"). So far, Deleuze and Guattari would agree
with Adorno, Althusser, and the psychoanalytic tradition.
- Such is
not the case, however, with respect to Scanner's track "Without
End" (disc 2, track 7 of IM). Here a hoarse
voice whispers of events or hecceities, saying, "it is
dawn eternally, time of prophecy," while the process of
sound assembly creates an unexpected auditory space-time that
does not double or reflect the sonic contour of that voice.
The slow, diffuse metric pulse of human breathing provides a
foundation for the piece, a foundation upon which are laid layers
of indistinct vocal sounds, ungraspable fragments of speech
and angular melodic cells that constitute an unstable soundscape.
The listener does not (mis)recognize her/himself in the vocal/harmonic
pattern here, but rather must wait for some pattern to emerge,
only to see it subside again into the constantly mutating mix.
A similar procedure of discontinuous assemblage, though often
without the intelligible lead vocal that provides thematic continuity
and territorialization here, underlies all of Scanner's work,
including his piece on FR, "Control:
Phantom Signals with Active Bandwidth" (track 4). Robin
Rimbaud took the name "Scanner" from his primary
enabling musical machine, the broadband scanner that intercepts
the transmissions of radios, cellular telephones, and other
broadcast machinery. His method itself is formally subversive
and deterritorializing, in that he is transforming a surveillance
technologyoriginally devised to allow police to monitor
broadcast communications and intervene in that mediuminto
a generator of aesthetic affects and percepts. But it is also
a new territorialization, as he has said:
A good way of putting it with the scanner stuff is mapping
the city
it's like mapping the movements of people
during different periods of the day. It's fairly predictable
[during the day]
. Then in the evening, that's where
the riot happens. That's when it gets really exciting because
all hell gets let loose. The phone rates go down and people
have the most surreal conversations. I've always been interested
in the spaces in these conversations
It amazed me
with these mobile phones, which are much more expensive
than standard phonesyou get these enormous gaps happening.
They're the points that really interest me. What's happening
in there. (cited in Toop, 35)
In deterritorializing
the technology, he generates a new refrain and hence new spatio-temporal
territory: a perceptual map of the city and the day. From his
recordings of human voices snatched from these broadcast bands,
Scanner often selects the least intelligible statements, those
that are so unconventional and decontextualized that they carry
no direct meaning even when they can be understood clearly;
he also selects voices that have been so distorted in transmission
that they cannot be understood at all. These voices, and even
the static-filled gaps in conversations, are used as concrete
sound, as in musique concrète. In other words,
he uses the scanner as a source of raw sonorous material and
not generally as a source of subjectively referential information,
as the police do; the demand for stable reference and command
that informs police use of surveillance technology is much closer
to the territoriality of the traditional pop song form (and
to psychoanalytic criticism of it) than to Scanner's audio maps.
- Scanner
deterritorializes the voice by centering it in the mix, but
depriving it of its direct signifying capacity and its continuous
harmonic intensification. In his piece "Control,"
we hear voices speaking, but often we cannot understand what
they are saying. The voices become elements of the sound, values
of timbre, without the privilege (and limitation) of discursive
meaning. "Only when the voice is tied to timbre does it
reveal a tessitura that renders it heterogeneous to itself and
gives it a power of continuous variation: it is then no longer
accompanied, but truly 'machined'" (A Thousand Plateaus
96). The voice always has timbre, of course, but not all timbre
is equally perceptible; indeed, the mark of the "trained"
or "pure" singing voice is precisely its minimal noticeable
timbre in comparison with the gruff, cracked or shrill vocal
quality of blues or rock singers.
By "machined" Deleuze and Guattari mean that the timbrally
distinctive voice ceases to be tied to a stable harmonic structure
or its attendant subjective form as limiting territories, and
is instead opened up to a process of sonorous production that
exceeds the expression of an individual psyche. The voice becomes
an inhuman sound, a noise, and is no longer personal, subjective,
or most importantly, subjectifying (interpellating). Like Adorno,
psychoanalytic critics treat this inhuman vocality as a source
of anxiety that must inevitably be repressed, only to return
as an uncanny recorded double of the fractured self (Engh, 1994,
130-31). Deleuze and Guattari, on the other hand, find in this
inhumanity, so unexpectedly close at hand, an affirmative and
convenient step out of the straightjacket of normative subjectivity.
- The uncanny
point of indiscernibility between human voice and inhuman sound
can be reached in a number of ways. For example, it is what
post-serial composers like Milton Babbitt and Luciano Berio
have sought in their vocal and electronic works through the
transformation of traditionally trained voices. Babbitt's Philomel
for soprano, recorded soprano and synthesized sound (1963) dramatizes
the Greek myth of Philomel's metamorphosis
into a nightingale by continuously manipulating the soprano's
voice, sending it off down a line of flight toward one, then
the other of the endpoints of its constant becoming: singing
woman or synthesized bird. The sonic affirmation of flight from
a constraining subjectivity counterbalances the mythic tragedy
of Philomels punishment. Berio's Thema: Omaggio a Joyce
(1958) and Visage (1961),29
both electronic manipulations of soprano Cathy Berberian's voice
on tape, occupy the same point of transition between voice as
discursive meaning and voice as inhuman sound. Of Thema,
which actualizes the virtual fuga per canonem in the
"Sirens" chapter of James Joyce's Ulysses,
Berio has written,
I was interested in developing new criteria of continuity
between spoken language and music and in establishing continual
metamorphoses of one into the other
[In Thema]
it is no longer possible to make distinctions between word
and sound, and between sound and noise; or between poetry
and prose, and between poetry and music. We are thus forced
to recognize the relative nature of these distinctions,
and the expressive characters of their changing functions.
(Berio 1998, 1)
Scanner's
work uses different techniques and different vocal timbres,
but it forces a similar recognition upon us as well, one that
complements the political subversiveness of his chosen medium:
there is a becoming-sound of the voice that can draw the subject
into a parallel becoming-other of the self, one that is marked
not by primal castration anxiety but by prospective affirmation.
- Even so,
the indiscernibility of voice and sound in Scanners pieces
often highlights, paradoxically, the subjectively expressive
power of the voice even in the absence of intelligible meaning.
The deterritorializing line of flight out of normative subjective
structure may reterritorialize within something similar to the
psychoanalytic paradigm. Even when we cannot understand the
words or locate a melody in "Control" or "Without
End," we can sometimes still extract some signifying value
by grasping the mood or tone of the sounds.
- This reterritorializing
aspect has also been explored by post-serial composers, most
significantly by György Ligeti in his pieces Aventures
(1962) and Nouvelles Aventures (1962-65), for three singers
and seven instrumentalists. In these pieces, Ligeti uses an
invented language to demonstrate that "All the ritualized
human emotions that are expressed colloquially, such as understanding
and dissension, [etc
] can be expressed exactly in the
a-semantic emotional artificial language." In singing this
artificial language, the performers produce "the opposite
of what we were used to at the performance of an opera
: the stage and protagonists are evoked by the musicthe
music is not performed to accompany an opera, but an opera is
performed within the music" (Ligeti 1985, 8-9). Here the
accompaniment itself serves to interpellate the listening subject,
even without direct address from the voice.
- The reductio
ad absurdam of this situation is surely the Residents' album
The Third Reich and Roll, which consists of two LP-side-long
"semi-phonetic interpretations of Top Forty hits from the
Sixties" (Residents 1979). On this album the Residents,
perhaps the most important conceptual art band in pop, perform
hit singles like the Rascals' "Good Lovin'," Lesley
Gore's "It's My Party" and the Mysterians' "96
Tears" as if they had only been heard over a poor quality
AM radio; the melodies and arrangements are largely intact,
but the words are reduced to "semi-phonetic"
approximations at best, in acknowledgement of the historical
and phenomenological experience of many actual listeners who
would have encountered much of the most influential pop music
of the twentieth century via low-fidelity AM radio.30
The Residents' method also ironically acknowledges the fundamental
irrelevance of stable discursive meaning to the world of pop,
where pure sound intensity and affective projection should rule.
- The imperative
to deterritorialize the voice, to use it timbrally rather than
harmonically or referentially, must include even the voice of
the philosopher who articulates that imperative. There is a
difference, however imperceptible it may be, between the randomly
sampled voices used by Scanner, or the rigorously disciplined
voices required for the performance of Babbitt's, Berio's, and
Ligeti's pieces, and the singular voice of Deleuze himself.
It is the difference between the deterritorialized voice and
the deterritorializing voice, between hearing a voice become
an inhuman sound and actually becoming an inhuman sound via
that voice. Deleuze once said,
Some of us can be moved by certain voices in the cinema.
Bogart's voice. What interests us is not Bogart as subject,
but how does Bogart's voice function? What is the function
of the voice in speaking him?
It can't be said that
this is an individualizing voice, even though it is that
also
I deterritorialize myself on Bogart
It's
a kind of metallic voice
a horizontal voice, it's a
boring voiceit's a kind of thread which sends out
a sort of very very very special sonorous particles. It's
a metallic thread that unwinds, with a minimum of intonation;
it's not at all the subjective voice. (Vincennes
Seminar, 215)
Deleuze's
own voice was also such a non-subjective "metallic voice"
through which others deterritorialized themselves.
At his death, his friends and colleagues uniformly evoked his
familiar gruff voice, which Richard Pinhas described as "difficult
but beautiful" (Heldon 1973), and two of the artists on
the memorial discs make use of that deterritorializing voice
in their compositions. Hazan + Shea, in "Rhizome: No Beginning
No End" (track 5 on FR), sample Deleuze's voice from the
Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze television
broadcasts. In the first section, "End," they use
Deleuze's voice as pure timbre, setting its isolated phonemes
against a synthesized ensemble of keyboards, strings and percussion;
in the second section, "Beginning," the voice re-emerges
as a signifying instrument as the sentences broken down into
timbral elements in section one are cited in their entirety.
Hence the inversion of sequence: (no) end before (no) beginning.
Wehowsky/Wollscheid's "Happy Deterritorializations"
(disc 1, track 2 of IM) "reformulates
an auratic
sound, once recorded by a French rock band accompanied by a
reciting Gilles Deleuze [sampled from "Le voyageur"
by Heldon on Heldon 1973]. Pieces of this archetypal sound are
projected onto different contemporary sound matrixes and merge
with their sonic corpora" (Wollscheid in IM, 9). Wehowsky/Wollscheid
enfold and unfold Deleuze's voice by sampling, resequencing
and overdubbing his performance with Heldon to create a multiplied,
polyphonic, deterritorializing/reterritorializing Deleuzean
voice distanced from and in conversation with itself.
- Richard
Pinhas' latest recordings, released by Sub Rosa and Cuneiform,
constitute a third memorial disc, though they are not billed
as such, and they too are organized around Deleuze's words and
voice. For this project Pinhas recruited the musicians (and
science-fiction writers) Norman Spinrad and Maurice Dantec to
form a unit called Schizotrope, subtitled "The Richard
Pinhas & Maurice Dantec Schizospheric ExperienceFrench
Readings of Gilles Deleuze's Philosophy with Metatronic Music
and Vocal Processors" (Schizotrope 1999 & 2000). Much
of these discs reprise Pinhas' earlier collaborations with Deleuze:
either Deleuze's words, read by Dantec, are set to music, or
Deleuze's voice itself is set. They differ in the form the musical
setting takes. On the initial Heldon recording of "Le voyageur,"
the music can be described as progressive rock, as bands like
Heldon and King Crimson were inventing it in the early Seventies,
music which we have described as "bolero-like" in
structure and sound. Schizotrope's music,
however, is quite different from that. Instead of repeating
metric and harmonic forms in regularly striated space-time,
the new music is smooth and ambient. Drawing on experiments
from his previous solo album De l'Un et du Multiple (1996),
Pinhas has created a contemporary style that owes equal amounts
to the Nineties explosion of sampled, computer-generated techno
music, and to the pioneering Seventies/Eighties "Frippertronics"
work of King Crimson founder Robert Fripp.31
Eric Tamm defines Frippertronics as follows: it is
the technological setup whereby two reel-to-reel tape recorders
were connected together and to
electric guitar; [and
it is also] the musical style, that is, the potential for
creatively shaping ever-fluctuating masses of sound in real
time, ordinarily upon a tonal, pandiatonic, modal or multi-modal
basis; and the various uses of Frippertronicsas music
performed solo, or as one timbral/structural element within
a more conventional song, or as a "thematic sound"
used to unify a large musical collage
(Tamm 1990,
115)
By the Nineties,
the technological setup had changed to include DAT recorders
and digital signal control, but otherwise the description remains
accurate (though, significantly, Fripp changed the name of the
activity to the more territorial "soundscapes"). The
interconnected recorders produce cyclic loops of varying durations
that grant a periodicity to even the most irregular meters.
At the same time, the "thematic sound" gradients of
modulating tone and timbre establish smooth lines of sonorous
continuity against which Deleuze's words and voice are set.
Pinhas' work here is at once the most territorial of the pieces
we have examined, in that Deleuze's concepts and the grain of
his voice clearly function as continuous centering elements
in the sound assemblage (see A Thousand Plateaus 96),
and also perhaps the most conceptually radical in its extensive
deployment of Deleuze's thought according to its own internal
logic and rhythm. Instead of the repetitive interpellations
of harmonic doubling, we find pure differences of sonorous intensity.
|
|