- Following
Deleuze's suicide in November 1995, two record labels released
memorial CDs in his honor. The first, Folds
and Rhizomes for Gilles Deleuze (hereafter abbreviated FR),
had been prepared by the Belgian label Sub Rosa prior to his
death but did not reach stores until afterward.15
In the liner notes to that disc, label founder Guy Marc Hinant
writes:
"L'Anti-Oedipe
was written by the two of us, and since each of us was several,
we were already quite a crowd." It is on the basis
of this sentence, the first in Mille Plateaux, that
we conceived of Sub Rosa. From the beginning, we wanted
to be more than a label; a machine perhaps, composed of
rhizomes, of peaks and troughs, of tranquility and doubt
Obviously, this is not an official tribute to this great
figure, one of the foremost of our time. It is only the
fraternal salute of a few young people who admire him deeply,
and who, better still, were one day helped in their lives
and in their creations by his writings.
The disc contains tracks by five bands or artists, four of which
also contributed tracks to the second memorial project, a two-disc,
27-track set entitled In Memoriam Gilles Deleuze (hereafter
IM), from the Mille Plateaux label in Frankfurt, Germany.
Founder Achim Szepanski describes the work of the artists on
his label as "Becoming, so that the music goes beyond itself;
this is the search for the forces of the minoritarian that the
label Mille Plateaux is part of. In a letter Gilles Deleuze
welcomed the existence of such a label" (IM, 5,
trans. modified).
- Both of
these labels are independents, unaffiliated with the large multinational
music corporations that dominate the international recording
market. They are also "alternative" labels, in the
sense that the music they circulate is not designed to compete
directly with the "mainstream"
music of multinational labels. In addition to the Deleuze tribute
discs, Sub Rosa has also released recordings of sound experiments
by William S. Burroughs, Antonin Artaud,
Bill Laswell, and Richard Pinhas, among others, while Mille
Plateaux specializes in dense techno dance/trance mixes and
electronica.16
What they have in common is a focus on musicians who have been
profoundly affected by the most recent computer revolution in
musicthe one that broke the monopoly of large, limited-access
mainframe machines (and their bureaucratic administrators) over
sound synthesis.17
The proliferation of personal computers through
the Eighties and Nineties spawned an entire generation of musicians
(and listeners) for whom sound is practically a tactile substance,
digitally reproducible, malleable and storable, and consequently
for whom traditional musical forms and notation have become
increasingly irrelevant.18
Their music is pop, not in the Adornian sense of commodity music
produced by corporate professionals and intended to impose a
false universality upon consumers, but in a sense much closer
to the old meaning of "popular": an amateur, bricolage
music arising from people's everyday activities. In
this regard at least, the contemporary cultural situation is
similar to those that gave rise to the blues, or to the American
counter-culture of the Sixties and the Italian one of the Seventies.
Today, everyday activities for many people depend upon advanced
digital technology, and the music that arises from, or mixes
with, those activities constitutes an index of political potentialities
that have yet to coalesce.19
- What use
were Deleuze and Guattari's concepts to these musicians who
were seeking new categories and forms for musical creation and
social intervention? We turn now to discerning the ways in which
certain musicians have detached concepts from, or grafted elements
onto, Deleuze and Guattari's philosophical rhizome for use in
their own creative activities. To do so, we must make a little
machinic assemblage, a refrain or temporary musical territory,
of our own: we must select a few tracks, passing over others
in silence, and re-sequence them in order to make the breaks
fall, not between the two memorial discs, but between our particular
line of enquiry and other virtual lines. Our choice of line
should be construed neither as an essentially privileged account
of these recordings nor as a devaluation of other approaches
to them, but simply as one stem of a rhizome. We do what we
can with them, and leave it to other listeners to do otherwise.
- For our
enquiry, the clearest line goes back to Deleuze and Guattari's
basic concepts, but we view it from the less systematic, more
pragmatic and selective perspective of these musicians. Music
is made of percepts, intensive sensory complexes which "are
no longer perceptions; they are independent of a state of those
who experience them
Sensations, percepts, and affects
are beings whose validity lies in themselves and exceeds
anything lived" (What is Philosophy, 164, trans.
modified). But before the elements of music can be percepts,
they must become perceptible. This becoming-perceptible complements
or complicates the becoming-imperceptible of movement which
Bergson described:
If movement is imperceptible by nature, it is always so
in relation to a given threshold of perception, which is
by nature relative and thus plays the role of a mediation
on the plane that effects the distribution of thresholds
and percepts and makes forms perceivable to perceiving subjects.
It is the plane of organization and development, the plane
of transcendence, that renders perceptible without itself
being perceived, without being capable of being perceived.
(A Thousand Plateaus 281)
This threshold
of perception must be crossed for music to arise, and the work
of the musician is directed toward making perceptible what is
as yet imperceptible.
- The crossing
of the threshold is the object of two tracks on IM, Jim O'Rourke's
"As In" (disc 2, track 1) and DJ Spooky's "Invisual
Ocean" (disc 2, track 8). O'Rourke's track takes almost
three minutes to fade slowly into perceptibility, and as it
does it gradually assembles a smooth continuum of modulated
sound (to which we will return in a moment). This track assembles
itself as a perceptible continuum, however, only through the
accumulation and superposition of myriad instantaneous "little
perceptions." It is like the murmuring of Leibniz's ocean:20
we say that the little perceptions are themselves distinct
and obscure (not clear): distinct because they grasp differential
relations and singularities; obscure because they are not
yet 'distinguished,' not yet differenciated. These singularities
then condense to determine a threshold of consciousness
in relation to our bodies, a threshold of differenciation
on the basis of which the little perceptions are actualised,
but actualised in an apperception which in turn is only
clear and confused; clear because it is distinguished or
differenciated, and confused because it is clear. (Difference
and Repetition, 213)
As the little perceptions accumulate, their differences become
audibly distinct from one another (to the perceiving subject),
and in so doing they define a large-scale perception of the
ocean. The perception of the ocean is clear because the little
perceptions from which it is assembled are audibly distinct,
but because the little perceptions are not fully individualized,
this clear perception remains dynamically confused. DJ
Spooky's track assembles such an audible ocean, which remains
"Invisual" (invisible or infra-visual, imperceptible
to vision?), out of non-maritime sound elements
in precisely this way. This ocean forms part of the larger sonorous
and social territory that defines all his work: "I wanted
to create music that would reflect the extreme density of the
urban landscape and the way its geometric regularity contours
and configures perception
The sounds of the ultra futuristic
streetsoul of the urban jungle shimmering at the edge of perception"
(DJ Spooky 7-8).21
- Once the
threshold of perceptibility has been crossed, the assemblage
of sound begins to actualize its space-time, its imperceptible
plane of organization. Such a plane actualizes itself in terms
of its breaks and cuts, or rather its resistance to them. A
smooth, sonorously continuous space-time unfolds, as in O'Rourke's
"As In": glissandi, continuous lines or gradients
of sound that modulate from tone to tone without discontinuous
jumps across the sonorous spectrum.
The tracks by the German group Oval,
"You Are * Here 0.9 B" (disc 2, track 2 of IM)
and "SD
II Audio Template" (track 3 of FR), also embody
this smooth construction, at least temporarily. The Oval tracks
also intentionally dramatize the process by which smooth space-time
becomes striated and vice-versa. "Oval is a very strict
and limited approach," claims principal musician Markus
Popp, "in order to make some new distinctions clearand,
in a way, to go beyond the music concept, the music metaphors
underlying the concepts used in the digital instruments involved"
(quoted in Weidenbaum). In "SD II Audio Template,"
the continuously modulating tones are abruptly interrupted by
punctual percussive events that sound like scratches on the
surface of an LP. These interruptions obviously allude to the
dialectic of tone and noise, consonance and dissonance that
has defined modern music from Schoenberg to Cage, but they also
have a more novel function. Despite their metric irregularity,
these events introduce something like a rhythm or striation
into the smooth plane. As Deleuze and Guattari point out, "Meter,
whether regular or not, assumes a coded form whose unit of measure
may vary
whereas rhythm is the Unequal or the Incommensurable";
this unequal element is the imperceptible "difference that
is rhythmic, not the repetition" of perceptible meter (A
Thousand Plateaus 313-14). These irregular striations are
digitally "looped" to form a repeating metric phrase
that constitutes the striated space-time of the Oval track.
Thus metric irregularity at short intervals becomes rhythmic
regularity at longer intervals or higher levels of scale.
- Conversely,
the striations can also reconstruct a smooth space/time through
acceleration and accumulation; in "SD II Audio Template"
this happens when the metric striations occur at shorter and
shorter intervals until they begin to overlap, either in actuality
or simply in the perception of the listener. As they do so,
their differenciated or striated features begin to merge, to
return to a smooth continuity or indistinguishability at a higher
frequency. The track passes through a circular progression,
from smooth sonorous continuity to striation and then back to
smoothness via increasing striation. As a result of these exemplary
transformations, this track by Oval can stand, as its title
implies, as an "audio template" or abstract map because
it reveals that all audio assemblages are in fact what Deleuze
and Guattari call multiplicities: "A multiplicity has neither
subject nor object, only determinations, magnitudes, and dimensions
that cannot increase in number without the multiplicity changing
in nature." Thus when the tempo of striation, the number
of one of the track's sonorous dimensions, increases, not only
the speed of the piece but also its sound quality changes. "When
Glenn Gould speeds up the performance of a piece, he is not
just displaying virtuosity, he is transforming the musical points
into lines, he is making the whole piece proliferate" (A
Thousand Plateaus 8). Just as acceleration changes the nature
of the piece, so does deceleration. Obviously,
deceleration of a sound lowers its pitch and thus alters its
tone quality, but it also alters all its other relationships
and reveals qualitatively new features in them; if you slow
down a passage of pizzicato strings, for example, you will find
the continuous hum of a motor. To a certain extent, the Blue
Byte track "Can't Be Still" (disc 1, track 12 of IM)
and the Bleed track "Pâtent" (disc 2, track
5 of IM) also embody this principle of audio multiplicity
via acceleration and deceleration.22
- Another
way that smoothness emerges from striationin fact, the
most common method employed on the Deleuze memorial discsis
via the superposition of a number of distinct metric patterns
of striation. These superposed patterns intersect at a variety
of singular inflection points, creating indirect harmonies and
virtual melodies. Deleuze and Guattari describe it this way:
Certain modern musicians oppose the transcendent plan(e)
of organization, which is said to have dominated all of
Western classical music, to the immanent sound plane, which
is always given along with that to which it gives rise,
brings the imperceptible to perception and carries only
differential speeds and slownesses in a kind of molecular
lapping. (A Thousand Plateaus 267)
In this molecular
(over)lapping the perceiving subject "hears"
virtual sounds that have not actually been played and "counts"
virtual beats that have not actually been measured. The amplified
ensemble music of Philip Glass is the most well known example
of this method of superposition; the track "The Grid"
from his soundtrack for the film Koyaanisqatsi is representative.
On the Deleuze memorial discs, the tracks contributed by Mouse
on Mars, "Subnubus" (track 1 on FR) and "1001"
(disc 2, track 3 on IM), provide examples of generative
superposition in techno music.23
- Within
the mutating smooth/striated space-time of the musical multiplicity,
other concepts drawn from Deleuze and Guattari's work also become
productive. In his piece "Unidirections/Continuum"
(disc 1, track 6 of IM), Christophe Charles makes use
of the techniques of musique concrète pioneered
by Pierre Schaeffer to construct a decentered sonorous rhizome
according to principles of connection and heterogeneity. Musique
concrète assembles not only pure sounds produced
by wave generators but also everyday sounds not normally considered
to be musical: the creaking of a hinge, a sigh. This heterogeneity
follows from the musician's recognition that all sonorous materials
are available for use on this plane of development. The musician
makes music by assembling "semiotic chains":
Semiotic chains of every nature are connected to very diverse
modes of coding (biological, political, economic, etc.)
that bring into play not only different regimes of signs
but also states of things of differing status
A rhizome
ceaselessly establishes connections between semiotic chains,
organizations of power, and circumstances relative to the
arts, sciences, and social struggles. A semiotic chain is
like a tuber agglomerating very diverse acts, not only linguistic,
but also perceptive, mimetic, gestural, and cognitive
(A Thousand Plateaus 7)
Charles' semiotic chains range from the unearthly
mechanical purity
of oscillator and wave generator tones to the entropic crackle
of broadcast static and recording surface noise. Between the
extremes, we hear pitched and unpitched percussion, sirens,
the delicate movement of water and sounds of flight in field
recordings; the heterogeneity of connected elements leads the
listener across vast distances of sonorous intensity.24
|
|
|